Tuesday, April 06, 2004
here's another thing john kerry actually said, as reported in the new york times:
'In his discussions on Monday, which were among his most extended sessions with reporters in weeks, Mr. Kerry suggested that he would not allow himself to be pigeonholed as a liberal and said that he expected to win some states in the South, although he declined to name them.'
first of all, he IS a liberal (and no, i don't mean a 19th century liberal), which is completely obvious to anyone who cares to look at his voting record in the senate. i mean, i'm no aristotelian, but john kerry certainly does not defy categorization, however complex he may be.
but who cares about that.
what really strikes me as funny is that this is at least the second time that kerry has claimed support from people and places he can't name. which makes me wonder--what southern states does he expect to win? cuba? haiti?
'In his discussions on Monday, which were among his most extended sessions with reporters in weeks, Mr. Kerry suggested that he would not allow himself to be pigeonholed as a liberal and said that he expected to win some states in the South, although he declined to name them.'
first of all, he IS a liberal (and no, i don't mean a 19th century liberal), which is completely obvious to anyone who cares to look at his voting record in the senate. i mean, i'm no aristotelian, but john kerry certainly does not defy categorization, however complex he may be.
but who cares about that.
what really strikes me as funny is that this is at least the second time that kerry has claimed support from people and places he can't name. which makes me wonder--what southern states does he expect to win? cuba? haiti?
