Thursday, September 16, 2004
i read in national review last night that a writer for harper's expounded upon the speeches given at the republican national convention, disparaging their content and moving on from there to criticize conservative ideas in general as 'archaic and bizarre'. the article was for the september issue, which means that the articles could have been finished by august 19 at the latest, according to NR. but the republican national convention didn't start until august 30, which means there's no way the writer in question could possibly have heard the speeches before commenting on them as though he had. way to go, liar.
maybe you can get hired at CBS.
maybe you can get hired at CBS.
